Company evidence & search profiles
Retain company information and supporting records. Save and reuse search profiles against local opportunities you supply; live external discovery is not part of this evaluation.
Lucevia · For government-contractor pursuit teams
Connect solicitation requirements to company evidence, explicit human review, and a traceable submission package.
See what is supported, what is missing, and what needs another look before your team makes the decision.
Beta interest is open. Software access follows release checks and participant onboarding. This is not a general commercial launch.
One pursuit, connected decisions
Lucevia is a standalone Opportunity & Pursuit Intelligence product, not just a bid/no-bid score. Its current evaluation connects these activities in a human-reviewed workflow.
Retain company information and supporting records. Save and reuse search profiles against local opportunities you supply; live external discovery is not part of this evaluation.
Review each requirement against current evidence, scope and limitations. Distinguish support, partial support, missing evidence and contradictions without inventing positive credit.
Record BID, NO-BID or HOLD explicitly. Preserve the supporting context and human decision history; an AI suggestion is not permission to submit.
Review source versions, requirements and affected work. Retain existing materials while explicitly reconsidering decisions that need a current evidence basis.
Prepare source-defined form fields, reuse reviewed company facts, and keep unknowns explicit. Attaching an artifact remains separate from determining that an obligation is satisfied.
Inspect reviewed-obligation readiness, governed approvals and package identity. Final human authorization remains separate from preparation and review.
Not another unexplained score
A linked document is a starting point, not proof that a requirement is met. Lucevia keeps source context, evidence limitations and human determinations distinct.
Unknown aggregate fit is shown as Not assessed, not an invented percentage. A prepared submission package is not the same thing as being qualified to win the work.
The current Core baseline completed controlled internal workflow validation and a bounded pre-commercial closeout. That is not independent-human certification, production-scale testing, or proof of customer outcomes.
We are recruiting practitioners to test whether the workflow is useful outside that controlled setting.
View the evaluationBefore you request access
Not in this evaluation. Search is literal against saved local opportunities supplied by the evaluator. Live external connectors and broader search-quality claims are outside the current tested scope.
No. Source interpretation, evidence sufficiency, pursuit decisions and submission authorization require human judgment. Internal human-reviewed results do not establish autonomous classifier accuracy, legal compliance or award probability.
Controlled local workflows, selected security and evidence controls, persistence, and regression behavior were tested internally. The same assistant participated in implementation and evaluation; no independent-human or strictly blinded validation claim is made. Live providers, certified translation quality and production-scale behavior remain outside that evidence.
No. Both are products of PEIS Intelligence LLC. PEIS focuses on project records and evaluation. Lucevia focuses on opportunity qualification, pursuit decisions and proposal preparation. Their evaluation programs are separate.
Practitioner evaluation
We are seeking three participating organizations, including small government contractors and experienced capture/proposal practitioners. Initial testing uses supplied fictional scenarios and approved public material.
60-day evaluation · $0 · No credit card · No automatic paid conversion. Enrollment is subject to release checks and participation terms.